Not fit for purpose? : an evaluation of the private rented sector housing system in England and a comparison with the German private rental system.

Abstract

This study seeks to evaluate the PRS in England to determine whether, in its current form, it is fit for purpose. The study establishes a set of criteria against which fitness will be measured, which are; • That it offers a reasonable level of security. • That is offers accommodation of a reasonable standard and condition. • That it offers affordable accommodation, is a key part of the housing market and is a mainstream housing option. As part of this evaluation this study looks at the legislative and regulatory framework underpinning the PRS as well as how the PRS functions in practice. A holistic approach is taken, with consideration of the security in PRS accommodation, rent regulation and affordability and issues relating to property condition and their management. The study identifies inherent weaknesses in the current system, which have come about as a result the lack of strong regulatory control and piecemeal reform. It identifies the inbuilt insecurity of tenure in most PRS tenancies as an all-pervading issue, impacting on tenants’ security as well as their ability to enforce and enjoy their other rights and makes recommendations to reform the tenancy structure, strengthen control over housing costs and consolidate and strengthen the regulations relating to property condition in the PRS. The thesis includes a comparative element. The private rented sector in Germany was selected as a comparator because of the positive reputation that sector enjoys. This study looks at the legislation and regulation of PRS accommodation in Germany and considers whether lessons can be learnt from the way the sector functions there. There are also comparisons made to other jurisdictions, with both the Welsh and Scottish models considered. Recommendations for reform are made with these comparisons in mind.