Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPattison, James-
dc.descriptionPhD Thesisen_US
dc.description.abstractI consider who should undertake humanitarian intervention. Should we prefer intervention by the UN, NATO, a regional or sub-regional organisation, a state, a group of states, or someone else? This thesis answers this question by, first, determining which qualities of interveners are morally significant and, second, assessing the relative importance of these qualities. The thesis then considers the more empirical question of whether (and to what extent) the current agents of humanitarian intervention actually possess these qualities, and therefore should intervene. Overall, I develop a particular conception of legitimacy for humanitarian intervention. I use this conception of legitimacy to assess not only the current interveners, but also the desirability of potential reforms to the mechanisms and agents of humanitarian intervention.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic and Social Research Councilen_US
dc.publisherNewcastle Universityen_US
dc.titleLegitimacy and humanitarian intervention : who should intervene?en_US
Appears in Collections:School of Geography, Politics and Sociology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
pattison06.pdfThesis20.41 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
dspacelicence.pdfLicence43.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.