<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/63">
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/63</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/6518" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/6451" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/6135" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/5837" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-02-04T04:52:14Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/6518">
    <title>The EU’s legal approach to protecting critical infrastructure from state-sponsored cyberattacks : a comparative study of the UK, Italy and Bulgaria</title>
    <link>http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/6518</link>
    <description>Title: The EU’s legal approach to protecting critical infrastructure from state-sponsored cyberattacks : a comparative study of the UK, Italy and Bulgaria
Authors: Saeva, Eva
Abstract: This thesis examines the EU’s legal approach to cybersecurity. It analyses the long road the EU&#xD;
has walked towards regulating cybersecurity and the challenges – both internal and external - it&#xD;
encountered along the way and which shaped its regulatory framework. It focuses on malicious&#xD;
state-sponsored cyber operations targeting the critical infrastructure (CI) sectors.
Description: PhD Thesis</description>
    <dc:date>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/6451">
    <title>Not fit for purpose? : an evaluation of the private rented sector housing system in England and a comparison with the German private rental system.</title>
    <link>http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/6451</link>
    <description>Title: Not fit for purpose? : an evaluation of the private rented sector housing system in England and a comparison with the German private rental system.
Authors: Graven, Ariann
Abstract: This study seeks to evaluate the PRS in England to determine whether,&#xD;
in its current form, it is fit for purpose. The study establishes a set of&#xD;
criteria against which fitness will be measured, which are;&#xD;
• That it offers a reasonable level of security.&#xD;
• That is offers accommodation of a reasonable standard and&#xD;
condition.&#xD;
• That it offers affordable accommodation, is a key part of the&#xD;
housing market and is a mainstream housing option.&#xD;
As part of this evaluation this study looks at the legislative and regulatory&#xD;
framework underpinning the PRS as well as how the PRS functions in&#xD;
practice. A holistic approach is taken, with consideration of the security&#xD;
in PRS accommodation, rent regulation and affordability and issues&#xD;
relating to property condition and their management.&#xD;
The study identifies inherent weaknesses in the current system, which&#xD;
have come about as a result the lack of strong regulatory control and&#xD;
piecemeal reform. It identifies the inbuilt insecurity of tenure in most PRS&#xD;
tenancies as an all-pervading issue, impacting on tenants’ security as&#xD;
well as their ability to enforce and enjoy their other rights and makes&#xD;
recommendations to reform the tenancy structure, strengthen control&#xD;
over housing costs and consolidate and strengthen the regulations&#xD;
relating to property condition in the PRS.&#xD;
The thesis includes a comparative element. The private rented sector in&#xD;
Germany was selected as a comparator because of the positive&#xD;
reputation that sector enjoys. This study looks at the legislation and&#xD;
regulation of PRS accommodation in Germany and considers whether&#xD;
lessons can be learnt from the way the sector functions there. There are&#xD;
also comparisons made to other jurisdictions, with both the Welsh and&#xD;
Scottish models considered. Recommendations for reform are made&#xD;
with these comparisons in mind.
Description: PhD Thesis</description>
    <dc:date>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/6135">
    <title>Takeovers of publicly traded companies in KSA : a critique of regulations and minority shareholders protection rules in the takeover context</title>
    <link>http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/6135</link>
    <description>Title: Takeovers of publicly traded companies in KSA : a critique of regulations and minority shareholders protection rules in the takeover context
Authors: Alsadhan, Khalid Sami O
Abstract: Takeovers are relatively new strategies and are still developing in the Kingdom of Saudi&#xD;
Arabia (KSA), which explains the lack of sufficient studies in this area. This work will&#xD;
attempt to explore the KSA system of takeover from a legal perspective. It is expected that&#xD;
this research will contribute to the body of knowledge in the sphere of takeovers and minority&#xD;
shareholders’ protection in takeovers in KSA and will serve as a major reference point in this&#xD;
area of concern. This thesis will provide a general critique of the takeover system of listed&#xD;
companies in the KSA. It will begin by providing an understanding of the KSA’s corporate&#xD;
governance system and ownership structure. It will then provide an insight into the KSA’s&#xD;
takeover system and the stock market. The thesis will examine the role of authorities that are&#xD;
concerned with takeovers, such as the Capital Market Authority (CMA) and the General&#xD;
Authority for Competition (GAC). The research will question the efficiency of the current&#xD;
KSA regulations in protecting minority shareholders’ and directors’ duties in takeovers. The&#xD;
thesis argues that the existing laws in KSA are not effective in protecting minority&#xD;
shareholders in takeovers, while considering influential factors in the KSA environment, such&#xD;
as the concentrated ownership structure. The research also argues that the regulations&#xD;
governing directors’ roles and duties in takeovers and the litigation actions to hold them&#xD;
accountable are unclear and vague and require reform. The UK takeover system will be used&#xD;
as a benchmark for this thesis in recommending reforms to address these issues and at the&#xD;
same time to fit into the KSA’s legal environment. The primary objective of this research is&#xD;
to suggest reforms to the KSA takeover system of publicly traded companies to improve&#xD;
certain areas that the researcher found to have issues, especially minority shareholders’&#xD;
protection and directors’ roles and duties. From the researcher’s point of view, the suggested&#xD;
reform would contribute to the promotion of a sound takeover system and, more generally, to&#xD;
the development of the corporate governance system and commercial environment in the&#xD;
KSA.
Description: PhD Thesis</description>
    <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/5837">
    <title>Incest between consenting adults: a case for decriminalisation?</title>
    <link>http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/5837</link>
    <description>Title: Incest between consenting adults: a case for decriminalisation?
Authors: Beetham, Andrew
Abstract: Consent plays a key role in most sexual offences. For example, the presence of&#xD;
consent removes any criminal liability for an offence such as rape or sexual assault.&#xD;
In contrast, sexual activity between adult family members (see Sexual Offences Act&#xD;
2003, ss. 64-65) is a criminal offence regardless of whether it takes place with or&#xD;
without the consent of both parties. This reflects a tension that exists within the criminal&#xD;
law. Generally, the criminal law is based upon the respect for the autonomy of the&#xD;
individual in its reflection of the traditional liberal account. The criminal law is also&#xD;
based upon harm and where an activity is presumed to be harmful (even when&#xD;
consensual) it is unlawful. In terms of sexual activity between adult family members,&#xD;
there are concerns that gendered family power dynamics and childhood abusive,&#xD;
grooming, or coercive behaviours may limit freedom of choice to consent, and that&#xD;
such relationships are, even if consensual, harmful to the family and institution of the&#xD;
family. This thesis aims to resolve the tension between autonomy and harm to protect&#xD;
the former removing the protection of the criminal law from those that are considered&#xD;
vulnerable. To do so, I argue that the criminal law ought to employ a relational&#xD;
approach to autonomy.&#xD;
The criminalisation of consensual sexual activity between adult family members has&#xD;
been justified on eight grounds. I analyse them to determine whether they enunciate&#xD;
any form of doctrine or are they just “scattered words”.&#xD;
A relational approach to autonomy focuses upon the constructiveness or&#xD;
destructiveness of a relationship between two (or more) people by allowing the&#xD;
relationship to be seen within its proper context (rather than on time specific&#xD;
circumstances at the time or shortly before an activity takes place). A relational&#xD;
approach employs a “deeper examination” (rather than “face value”) into this context&#xD;
which strengthens my argument that a relational approach can resolve the tension&#xD;
within the criminal law. I analyse whether a relational approach to autonomy is&#xD;
reflected in the current law relating to the sex with an adult relative provisions.
Description: Ph. D. Thesis</description>
    <dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

